[dropcap][/dropcap]The book is actually a translation of Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi’s well known work Al-Intabahāt Al-Mufīdah fī ḥal Al-Ishkālāt Al-Jadīdah by Prof. Hassan Askari and Karrar Husain.
During the colonial period Muslims were first exposed to the challenge of scientism. Though the challenge remains it caused the most serious concerns and uproar during the later part of the nineteenth and early decades of the twentieth century. As a result many among the Muslim ranks fell for it and started questioning some of the essentials of the Islamic rubric.
Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanwi penned this treatise to respond to the queries and questions of such segments of the Muslim society who gave in to modernism. The book is well organized. The Maulana begins with “first principles.” The seven principles he lays down and explains are then used to respond to objections and queries around the tenets of Islam such as belief in the angels, the Jinn, Satan, destiny and the life hereafter. There is a reasoned discussion and dispelling of doubts around the authority and authenticity of fundamentals sources of Islamic law: Qur’an, Hadith, Ijma’ (consensus) and Qiyas (analogy).
The pseudo-rational arguments against Islamic ideas raised today have their roots in the very misgivings addressed in this book. This is what makes the book equally relevant today even though written almost a hundred years ago.
In the foreword, the author addresses certain basic errors like calling for compilation of a “new dialectic theology” (‘ilm al-kalām) without realizing the fact that existing and known theological principles are sufficient and comprehensive enough to deal with all the new issues. He also criticizes the misplaced trust in “new” ideas without due scrutiny. He highlights how the so-called “new” ideas for which people seek to make revisions in Islamic conception of things are “hypothetical and conjectural.”
Transcription of the author’s speech at Muhammad Anglo-Oriental College, Aligarh is given as preface wherein the author tries to sensitize the students of modern sciences to the issue of doubts and tells of the right way to deal with them.
Language of the original work is naturally filled with logical and theological jargon yet the translators have done a commendable job by rendering it into simple language accessible to all.
The book can be downloaded HERE
— Reviewed by Waqar Akbar Cheema
Peace. Kalam cosmological argument refined by William Lane Craig and Hamza Tzortzis are good examples of new forms of dialectical theology but the credit goes to Imam Al-Ghazali who worked within traditional framework to formulate it. Fish should not be ashamed of not knowing how to climb a tree if it can swim well.
Please add a subscription option to your site that enables your revisionists to know about new posts.